figment: A treewoman, a dryad, her arms are branches (Default)
[personal profile] figment
Dismissed. Hooray! I guess they didn't want someone with extensive experience in the Middle East and fairly strong views on religious persecution and immigration on that particular case. I thought they might not.

Hooray! I don't have to try to do two jobs at once. Phew.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-09-05 06:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jgs42.livejournal.com
I've gotten the jury duty questionnaire in the mail twice. Once I filled it in and wasn't even picked to come in to sit around on the hard bench. The second time (more recently) I got a date to come in and sit around but was dismissed over the phone the morning of. (If I recall correctly I was supposed to come in on January 2.) Maybe it's just the luck of the draw or maybe one of my questionnaire answers was unattractive to one of the attorneys...

(no subject)

Date: 2007-09-05 11:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] birdfigment.livejournal.com
The entire 10 years I lived in MN, I was never called, never sent questionnaires, nothing. Here, I have now been called once for DC jury duty and once for Federal jury duty - so I guess I have that out of the way. But I think this demonstrates the smaller size of the pool here relative to the number of court cases. You're just more likely to get called. The earlier call - the DC one - all I did was wait; I was never even on a selection panel. This one, I was on the selection panel, but I am sure I turned the government attorneys off by having opinions about immigration and religious persecution and the Middle East... I got a questionnaire and a phone number to call for this one, but alas, I called the number and it just said, "lucky you! You get to report at 8 AM!" I don't remember the questionnaire having anything on it that would be particularly damning/easy to eliminate you by - did yours have anything of substance on it?

(no subject)

Date: 2007-09-06 12:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jgs42.livejournal.com
Anything of substance? Not really. Age, sex, ethnicity, education, home address are probably the things that could have been used as screens. Maybe profession, I don't recall.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-09-05 06:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] whthorse.livejournal.com
Great news. I was surprised that the trial was set for 6 weeks long. That would have really put a cramp in things.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-09-05 11:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] birdfigment.livejournal.com
Yah. Federal trial instead of DC...which I guess makes it longer. It also meant it was in a different courthouse than the DC one, and that they pay you $40 a day (instead of $4 a day or whatever it is at the DC one). It was actually a case that had been transferred from Detroit! The only bummer is that it sounded really interesting - but also difficult. I probably would not have been a very good juror for the case - too emotionally involved.

6 weeks of trying to do my job at CTE on the evenings and weekends would have been horrible, I have to say. I am so relieved that I was dismissed.

Profile

figment: A treewoman, a dryad, her arms are branches (Default)
figment

December 2015

S M T W T F S
  12345
678 9101112
13141516171819
202122232425 26
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios