figment: A treewoman, a dryad, her arms are branches (Default)
figment ([personal profile] figment) wrote2008-01-05 01:23 pm
Entry tags:

(no subject)

[livejournal.com profile] wavebreaker recently posted a link to a political quiz that lets you see how you match up with the various candidates, on the issues. I have to admit I've mostly been sticking my head in the sand for this election so far, coming up occasionally to opine about how great it'd be to have a woman president or a minority president. But I haven't really looked at where candidates stand on the issues of the election. Since this site references/cites the candidates' own websites and platforms, it's easier to sort that out now. Seems like a good place for me to start, anyway.

Barack Obama
You are 5% economic left
You are 3% more progressive
You have a substantive agreement of 80%
John Edwards
You are as economic right as economic left
You are 14% more progressive
You have a substantive agreement of 77%
Bill Richardson
You are 2% economic right
You are 18% more progressive
You have a substantive agreement of 74%
Hillary Clinton
You are 5% economic right
You are 19% more progressive
You have a substantive agreement of 75%
Ron Paul
You are 48% economic left
You are 35% more progressive
You have a substantive agreement of 53%
Rudy Giuliani
You are 53% economic left
You are 54% more progressive
You have a substantive agreement of 47%
John McCain
You are 45% economic left
You are 68% more progressive
You have a substantive agreement of 41%
Mitt Romney
You are 55% economic left
You are 68% more progressive
You have a substantive agreement of 38%
Mike Huckabee
You are 50% economic left
You are 74% more progressive
You have a substantive agreement of 34%
Fred Thompson
You are 53% economic left
You are 83% more progressive

Course By Nov 08 I'll want a 'Why Choose the Lesser Evil: Cthulu for President' bumper sticker.

[identity profile] katana-girl.livejournal.com 2008-01-05 09:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Woohoo for heads in the sand!

I made a conscious decision to ignore the presidential campaign until 08 because I'm tired of the never ending campaign cycle.

Jan 01 of the year the election takes place seems like a sensible time for anyone who doesn't want to do the early stuff or work on a political campaign to start expending cycles on this

[identity profile] minnehaha.livejournal.com 2008-01-05 09:33 pm (UTC)(link)
No surprises, really.

B

[identity profile] doctorwannabe.livejournal.com 2008-01-06 12:24 am (UTC)(link)
Well that was interesting. It put me closer to Obama than Clinton. I wasnt expecting that.

[identity profile] birdfigment.livejournal.com 2008-01-06 04:37 am (UTC)(link)
I wasn't expecting it either, but then again, as I said, I hadn't really paid any attention (yet) to where the candidates actually stand on issues.

[identity profile] gomi-no-sensei.livejournal.com 2008-01-06 02:58 am (UTC)(link)
How'd you get it to spit out those percentages?

I came out more fiscally liberal on this quiz than I normally do. I wonder if that's a function of the quiz or if I've shifted.

[identity profile] birdfigment.livejournal.com 2008-01-06 04:36 am (UTC)(link)
On the graph page, I clicked on the pencil indicating my own views. (When you hover over that, it says "analyse your position" and if you click on it it gives you all of the percentages.) You can also click on various candidates to analyze (or analyse, if you prefer) their positions.

[identity profile] jodi.livejournal.com 2008-01-06 04:10 am (UTC)(link)
we seem to have very similar politics. that is right about where the quiz pegged me, too.

[identity profile] tomscud.livejournal.com 2008-01-06 11:04 pm (UTC)(link)
The dartboard thing pegged me right on Obama's nose, and the numbers thing puts me at equally left/right economically and 1% more traditional (you radical leftist, you). Substantive agreement of only 74% tho - bill richardson was the highest at 76.

(PS the deleted comment from eve was because she was still logged in & i didn't realize it.)