(no subject)
It is ridiculous that 3 months of birth control pills cost me $105 today. With my (apparently somewhat lame, about 50% coverage) prescription plan/health insurance.
Wanna bet that a prescription for Viagra would have cost less?
Grr.
Wanna bet that a prescription for Viagra would have cost less?
Grr.
no subject
I love that LJ icon- you're hulking out! its awesome.
no subject
no subject
no subject
if you want something long term, you might want to look into that. i've been really happy with it.
(disclaimer: this is merely a suggestion ! )
no subject
As to the pill, ask Anthony how well it works :(
no subject
no subject
Or just a side effect of the plan to ruin healthcare system for everyone except for it's owners?
no subject
What would really make sense is for male medical aid clients to be able to subsidise half of their female partner's BC costs. It's hardly a selfish expense.
Source 1 (http://media.www.utahstatesman.com/media/storage/paper243/news/2003/02/12/Features/Insurance.Companies.Cover.Viagra.But.Not.Birth.Control-367485.shtml), Source 2 (http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=91538).
no subject
no subject
You've been caught...
Birth Control went through the roof over the summer. It had to do with changes in medicare brought about by the "Deficit Reduction Act" that basically removed all the incentives companies had to offer colleges and other places low cost BC. The pill, the patch, nuvaring, it all went through the frickin' roof. From 10$ to 40$ a month is quite common. Think it'll be enough to get some people active politically? Maybe interested a little bit in population politics? *sigh*
Here's one link on it. http://www.collegian.psu.edu/archive/2007/03/03-19-07tdc/03-19-07dnews-06.asp
I'm sure there's betters.
no subject
The fact that Americans PAY for b/c pisses me off to no end. It's free here. FREE!
There are downsides to nationalised healthcare but that isn't one of them, I must say.
Suck!
no subject
no subject
cost benefit analysis
no subject